Physicists find new state of matter that can supercharge technology - Big Think

Mental illness myth 

<p>The main driving psychological driving force behind mass shooters is a bit confused. Liza H. Gold and Robert I. Simon's book<em> Gun Violence and Mental Illness found that </em><a href="https://ift.tt/2PbVi5k" target="_self">less than 5 percent of mass shootings</a> have been connected to someone with a psychiatric disorder, or one that could be diagnosed.</p><p>Yet, to the psychiatric layperson (especially pundits and politicians) — the presumption to commit a heinous crime such as a mass shooting, seems like just the thing an insane person would do. No matter the categorization from the APA, or the DSM-5 keepers — common sense dictates that there is <em>something</em> seriously wrong with these people. </p><p>The psychological profile for mass shooters is usually a young angry and isolated male. Regardless of their ill-fated crusades, social woes, color or creed, they are all intellectually stunted idealogues. Radicalized by their sources of hate, ignorance and bigotry — the unholy three — and unfettered access to guns leads us to this ceaseless problem. </p><p>Yet, psychiatrists point out, again, that other regions of the world have the same exceptionally high amount of mental disorders, such as Western Europe. However, there is not the same high number of mass shootings. The care for our mentally ill and other ideas being floated around — among them, the dearth of our open mental institutions — are a related but separate problem entirely.</p>

<div class="ad-tag"> <div class="ad-tag__inner"> <div class="gallery_ad" id="div-bt_gallery1"></div> </div> </div>

<p>APA President Rosie Phillips Davis, Ph.D., <a href="https://ift.tt/31lCP7A" target="_blank">said equally as much:</a></p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"The combination of easy access to assault weapons and hateful rhetoric is toxic. Psychological science has demonstrated that social contagion — the spread of thoughts, emotions and behaviors from person to person and among larger groups — is real, and may well be a factor, at least in the El Paso shooting."</p><p>Currently, the best in class have a plan to lessen the frequency of mass shootings. Evans writes: </p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"Based on the psychological science, we know some of the steps we need to take. We need to limit civilians' access to assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. We need to institute universal background checks. And we should institute red flag laws that remove guns from people who are at high risk of committing violent acts."</p><p>The APA mentions that President Trump has called on the nation to "do a better job of identifying and acting on early warning signs." Research, that they think they can eventually do. Trump has also put forth the idea that he wants social media companies to develop A.I. that could flag potential mass shooters before they strike — <a href="https://ift.tt/2MjStfU" target="_self">something right out of a Philip K. Dick novel.</a></p><p>Evans ends his statement with a true call to arms, to get past the rhetoric once and for all and create real solutions.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"The president clearly said that it is time to stop the hateful rhetoric that is infecting the public discourse. We ask that he use his powerful position to model that behavior. And we ask that the federal government support the research needed to better understand the causes of bigotry and hate, and their association to violence, so that we may devise evidence-based solutions."</p>

]]>

https://ift.tt/2Ndpl9R